kdubken's Blog

   "{ Republicans can continue these cynical attacks,but we won't let them dicredit the idea that ordinary people can and should have a stake in their communities.

    We know that people who serve their communities--from those who fight for steady jobs and improved houseing in their neighborhoods, to those who work in soup kitchens and halfway houses, to the young people takeing time after class to register voters, to the volenteers who work  for better schools and cleaner streets--are a vital part of this country.They're not just fighting to make their communities better,they're fighting to make America better.

     If you believe in the power of ordinary people to do extraordinary things--if you refuse to stand by and watch these cynical Republicans attacks on grassroots service--please and help to register voters in your community.

     This is how real change has always come about in America, and this is how we'll bring change to America come November.}"--------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------These words appear in a blog by 1926miss from REC                      

          She takes no comments, so, I'm commenting on my own blog and inviteing comments.  In the first place, Republicans have made no, not any , none, cynical attacks on anyone. Just another Democratics LIE. Republicans have attacked no, not any, none of the good people working to improve communities throughout  this great land.

        THE FACT IS---A majority of the successful people in this great work are Republicans.

         This is how real change comes to America and is how John McCain/Sarah Palin will bring  real change successfully ------key word here( successfully) 

      Chicago community improvement programs are corruptions run by the Daily democratic machine.  There were more people killed in Chicago last year than Iraq.

     

        In a TV interview today Barak Oboma said the Republicans spent their convention time saying bad things about him and no time on issues. He described republican comments as negitive. He said the Republicans have no agenda and they called him names. Poor baby doesn't he know that what goes around comes around? I thing he learned a lesson from all this.  The lesson is: when you slap a woman -- make sure she isn't a hocky mom.  When youre on the wrong side of an issue  the opposition will point it out. 

      

        

  Denver  (AP)   reports 2 Obama supporters traveled from Rolla Mo.with their banner "Rednecks for Obama". The closest thing to a  (Redneck) the Obama campaign could come up with is a RETIERD STATE TROPPER and friend : Tony Veissman and Les Spencer. Veissman and Spencer addressed the "GUN" issue. "Veissman said he doesn't share his fellow rednecks' fear that Obama will try to take away their guns. We've had many Democratic presidents and we still have our guns." 

         As a card carrying REDNECK  I asked 5 of my redneck friends what they thought of  Obama and the  state troopers' remarks. Here are their answers:  Bob--*$@#% Bill--*%#^&*%    Ed*%*$^&    Sam---@$%^*Mike$^&*%^^

         Is nothing sacred to these people? Obama is exactly the kind of big city machine politition freedom loveing rednecks have allways voted against.

           Say one thing and do another is the prime Democratic's tactic.

        Sounds like a good idea to me.

 

 

 

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YzQ5OTgzZWRkMT
hhZTY5ZmUwNjNjZDZmNjJhYjVhZjU=

          " DRILL HERE DRILL NOW  PAY LESS" is the name of a petition being circulated on line by a site called " American Solutions. "  They have 1 350 000 people supporting the idea so for. If you want to pay less for gas get over to the site and make your opinion known.               AMERICAN  SOLUTIONS  for winning the future.

              Also write your congressman about blocking oil drilling.

        Rush Limbaugh is making 38 mil a year for making fun of liberal  foibles.  I have been doing the same for 50 years and haven't made a dime at it.  I am really jealous and just hate him for that.  If he didn't make so much sense I'd never listen to him again.

        My real feelings are a bit different of course.  Congratulations Rush for having the talent ,dedication and work ethic to succeed.  To a great guy, good citizen, and, self appointed Guru to the conservative movement I say----------------------------------------------------
--------We loveya Rushbo

        The Democratics' great idea to produce more oil is TO FORCE OIL COMPANIES TO DRILL WHERE THERE IS NO OIL. Drilling dry holes would do 2 things the Democratic Party wants. It would keep oil companies from making any money and make it to costly for Americans to drive cars.

          If you are a Democratic and would like to see the price of oil come down you might want to tell your congressman to drill where the oil is-----NOT WHERE IT AIN'T.

         The Democratic House actually has a bill before the house to make oil companies drill where there is no oil.    There is no end to the lunacy.

 Clair McCaskill  US senator of Missouri, who ran as a gun totein conservative ,recently ,wrote me that she was the proud co-sponsor of the Habeas Corpus  Restoration act s-185.  This bill provides that prisoners captured in war have access to US courts to determine the legality of their detainment. As stupid as this sounds on its' face, the implications are much worse. Does this mean each prisoner has to be advised of his rights by the soldier who captures him? Does it mean that terrorists could be freed because of procedural mistakes? Does it mean that military secrets used as evidence be public record. Are terrorist lawyers to be given military secrets under disclosure laws? -------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
---------------Is Sen McCaskill serving the terrorists or the people of Missouri?  Is she on our side ? Is she on Osoma's side? You Decide.

       "Obama'sSpeech Did NOT Have Lies" is the title of a recent blog by --(Dawgma)

        You can read that blog at MYFOXSTL.. The jist of it was : ( Just because Obama had heard controversial statements made by the reverand--- it did not mean they were the exact ones shown on youtube and we should quit nitpicking.----------------------------------------    
My comment was this.  'Dawgma" is the one nitpicking and parsing Obama's words down to the meaning of ( is)      Rev. Wright isn't an aquantence who Obama only hears on Sunday.----- Rev.Wright is a close friend of 20 years. Rev. Wright is Obama's preacher,teacher mentor,and,member of Obama's political family.-------- Rev.Wright  would be on the list for membership in Obama's cabinate. ---------Obama knows every view the reverend has ever expressed. Dawg if you re-read the speech with this in mind maybe you can find 1 or 2 little white lies.--------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
---------------Jimbob-0 maybe you would like to comment on that blog?

         A recient blog by webstergroves,makes it a big deal that President McCain said Alquada when he ment  Hasbula. Here we go again.---The Republican candadate isn't smart enough to be president. No Republican can aspire to the heights of intelligence personified by the Bombastic Babe of Bulbous Brilliance or Magnificant manifestations of Magic Negro. Give me a break. President Reagan and President Bush were both so dumb that they politically kicked the smartest Democratic butts into next week.   If  Ron and George are so dumb,what does that say about the people they beat?      If  McCain  is 1/2 as incompetent as George and Ronnie,he will do well.             

Pelosi and the house go on  spring break  after passing their," Don't Protect America Act". Thank God it has no chance of passage in the senate. Democratics passed the bill even after secret session to remind them how successfull the surveillance had been in stopping terror plots.

The house version of The Protect America Act, passed by Senate,is called [Foriegn Intelligence Surveillance Act} ------ Why not call it what it is? The Do Not protect America act. or Do not Protect Patriotic Americans Act. I have no idea why.--------

I only question why she wants to tie the hands of the military in the war on terror. Why have the democratics leaders taken the side of terrorists? Ms Pelosi is speaker of the house for crying out loud. This attack on the military during time of war surely does not reflect the wishes of rank and file democrats.

       Over the past 100 years the climate of earth has warmed 1 degree.C.  Last year the earths climate cooled I degree C. Wiped out 100 years of global warming in 1 year. Must have been Bush who did it.  Actually, the climate has been cooling for the last 10 years so Bush inherited the trend from the Clinton administration. That is why Al Gore bobbaloo on the subject.

 

 

           Pelosi continues to insist on big pay off to trial lawyers.  Our ability to monitor terrorist is eroded daily as democratics fight to weaken the Protect America Act.

       People bad mouth me a lot for saying the democratics aren't patriotic. I am also badmouthed for saying the democratic party change sides after they agree to military action ie. the war in Iraq and Viet Nam. I know that most rank and file democratics are good patriotic people. The national leaders. whom you elect however, are the most despicable provaricateing propaganda experts in the world.

Here is an example of how they work. Nancy Palosi dem. speaker of the house is blocking The Protect America Act  from a vote in the house.The bill has a large majority in the house who will pass it. It passed the senate by a super majority 69 to 28.

 For 1/2 a month now the house has  vacationed and named renamed a few  post offices and back to vacation while the protect America act hangs in limbo.

 The protect America act is needed so this country can monitor comunications between terrorists overseas. Palosi and the democratic left wing don't want it because it will prohibit trial lawyers from sueing telecom companies who help keep America safe.

Palosi would rather line the pockets of trial lawyers than protect America.

Whose side is she on?