MyFox
 

frenchmills's Blog

by frenchmills from SO ST LOUIS

Last Post 41 days, 10 hours Ago


Response to Missouri State Board of Education¹s Decision To Disenfranchise
St. Louis Citizens for Three More Years ­ From St. Louis Board of Education
President


The state board of education¹s decision to disenfranchise St. Louis citizens
for another three years shows how corrupted and antidemocratic the political
system in Missouri has become.

Not only is the decision void of any reasonable basis, it runs counter to
the very idea of public education, which by its very nature demands public
involvement. In violation of all norms of democratic process and of plain
common decency, the state board of education jumped to a conclusion without
informing either the citizens of St. Louis or their elected representatives
that this decision was on their agenda, much less did they provide an
opportunity for public comment. Under state law, the elected St. Louis Board
of Education is supposed to audit the progress made under the state
appointed board (SAB). Neither DESE nor the state board of education has
asked for any report on the district, nor did they make any effort to have
the SAB comply with state law to provide information to the St. Louis Board
of Education. The fact that they would make such an important decision while
hiding in Jefferson City and without seeking comment from citizens or St.
Louis is but another example of their lack of respect for St. Louis
residents.

While seeking to divorce the public from public schools, the state board
again is rejecting parental involvement in schools ­ four of the seven
members of the St. Louis Board of Education have children in St. Louis
Public Schools; no one on the SAB does.

Perhaps it should come as no surprise that such a thoroughly undemocratic
process would arrive at an irrational conclusion. Conditions in the district
have deteriorated over the last year: There is more instability at the top,
the financial progress the district was making has been slowed, and the
district¹s performance has fallen. In ratifying the decision of the SAB to
fire the superintendent so that they can administer the daily operations of
the school district themselves, DESE and the state board have again taken
the position that businessmen with no competence in education should run the
school district instead of trained educators. The state board¹s experiment
in disenfranchising St. Louis is a failure. The experiment in replacing
professional educators with businessmen 2003 was a disastrous failure. Yet
the state board insists on continuing those experiments for another three
years.

The only explanation is political. DESE and the commissioner of education
were fully behind the program of cutting services and turning chunks of the
school system over to private companies when the mayor¹s people ran the
school board. We believe the evidence shows that, when faced with the
prospect of a new board majority that put education first instead of private
profit, DESE altered and manipulated rules in order to justify taking over
the school system so that the state board could protect those private
contracts.

The elected school board just completed a planning process that, with input
from respected educational leaders in the metropolitan community, concluded
that the way to best improve the school district is through the professional
development of teachers and principals, not through private programs sold by
for-profit companies.

We believe that the state board quickly and quietly decided to extent its
control for another three years in order to continue transferring public
funds to private companies for questionable programs. Once again, they have
placed private profits ahead of educational opportunities for our children.

We hope that a new governor and new state assembly next year will clean up
the Augean mess that DESE has become.
13 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 13
Page 1 of 1
bubba-right-wing read my blog view my photos
May 24, 2008 | 7:03 AM

The City school system had decades to fix its own mess. Give the state a few years to educate people and show them what happens when you waste tax dollars on noneducation. I do not believe the state is very good at fixing problems but the city school system is even worse. All this money and trouble over how many students? Silly is it not?

baileygirlsmom read my blog view my photos
May 25, 2008 | 6:48 AM

SLPS has more than 35,000 students enrolled in the district. I agree the district is a mess and has been for years. I think that there should be a merging of the two boards so that they can work togeter to turn the district around.

Legolas read my blog view my photos
May 25, 2008 | 8:59 AM

This has been like a festering wound that has now become infected...with corruption and negleagence....time for some anticeptic!!...The State is the only recourse....remember when State troopers of Illinois had to patrol East St.Louis?...Now they don't have to...it's the same situation...until they can do it themselves again...

Chickenkiller read my blog
May 25, 2008 | 11:29 AM

I'd hardly call what's going on 'disenfranchisement!' Its more like keeping the elected school board from stealing what little is left of money that should be spent on education from lining the pockets of the school board.

Bottom line, the St. Louis City Schools cannot be fixed, period! Vouchers are the only solution!

baileygirlsmom read my blog view my photos
May 25, 2008 | 11:54 AM

SLPS can be saved but it will take alot of work. They need good, strong, stable leadership at the top and Principals in each school who will inspire good teachers to stay and teach but who are not afraid to cut the deadwood. The children need the public to see the potiential for greatness that each of them has and to stop considering them as lost causes.

blogsiren read my blog view my photos
May 26, 2008 | 1:34 PM

The people that consider these children lost causes seem to be their own parents. They don't participate in anything but the complaining. Why can't it be called what it is. Without the parents doing their job at home, the schools will not be able to do what they are designed to do, educate.
I agree, the school board of the city schools as well as many boards across the country, misappropriate and misuse authority. I would like to see some accountability for the enormous amount of money poured into the school systems.
Those that were given the responsibility to perform for the schools failed miserably. It isn't going to be fixed without time and support.

snoopydad24 read my blog view my photos
May 26, 2008 | 7:14 PM

The problems SLPS has been well documented by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch over the last thirty years. But all the districts at one time or another has had these problems some of which that hasn’t happened in SLPS. All districts have had embezzlers, misappropriation of funds, ghost students, and ramped nepotism. The one thing that has yet to happen on SLPS property is for a student to be shot and killed like one student did at McClure North Sr. High. In actuality ghost students were first reported in the early 90’s in Fort Zumwalt school district. Then the Post-Dispatch paid closer attention to student counts in SLPS. Gee now Mehlville has ghost students. Then there is Riverview Gardens who has all the same problems as SLPS but somehow escaped state intervention.

Chickenkiller since you insist on vouchers again you fail to solve the underlying problem. But since you want them lets make sure all student who want to go to Kirkwood, Lindbergh, Parkway, and lets also throw in MICDS, John Burroghs, and DeSmet. After all these schools and districts “are so much better.” Still waiting for your curriculum that I am sure is much better than what SLPS has in place. But I see you much rather pass the buck off to someone else and let them worry about it. Oh almost left out the most important fact – just because a student goes to a school somewhere other than SLPS does not guarantee a “better” education. Not to mention the school of choice has to be willing to accept these students. Right now Ladue is the only district SLPS students are not allowed at all.

snoopydad24 read my blog view my photos
May 26, 2008 | 7:14 PM

During the past several weeks I have provided several suggestions as to how to fix SLPS. From offering only one-year contracts to teachers, alternative education for students who do not fit “regular classroom” situations (problem children), annual independent audits (which I think should apply to all districts), wasting money on so-called “education” programs to improve test scores, and effective and stable leadership that includes the superintendent and the school board.

But remember education is 50% teaching and 50% learning. Students need to accountable for their class work as well as their actions in and out of school. If a student is not making the grade then don’t pass them onto the next grade or upper level class (aka social promotion).

Chickenkiller read my blog
May 27, 2008 | 9:41 PM

baileygirlsmom - Yeah, I supposed it could be fixed, but you reach a point when you've been promised that things are getting better, and if we only had more money.........and nothing that happened, that you need to cut your losses and do something radical.

That time has come with the St. Louis School system.

rhrealestate read my blog
May 28, 2008 | 12:45 PM

it's just fine the way it is, the people on the board just want control of the money.

PSylvester20 read my blog
May 29, 2008 | 4:07 PM

The reason why education, in general, in this country has declined is that we treat it as an entitlement. Don't get me wrong, I believe that anyone who WANTS an education should have access. But we need to kick the trouble makers to the curb. Public schools should have the right to refuse kids with chronic behavioral problems. Let their parents pay for a private education. I bet you'll see fewer discipline problems when it starts hitting ol' mom and dad in the pocket book.

snoopydad24 read my blog view my photos
May 29, 2008 | 5:58 PM

PSylvester I agree with what you have to say. The way it stands now if a child gets expelled that district has to find a school for that child to go to. Again other districts do not have to accept these students. Urban type districts like SLPS will take these kids in simply to increase their numbers. More numbers means more money.

I remember a couple of students who got suspended from McCluer North during their last semester. They were given explusion papers and an GED application – that was thirty years ago. Before that when the draft was in place problem students were immediately enlisted.

Times are different today than 30-50 years ago. Today we teach to some standardize test where before we were providing entry-level skills for a skill or trade. Again how many students can find jobs with test taking skills? Sure it might help the students get into college but what will these students be when they graduate? Get rid of the MAP or other standardize test and bring back skills students can actually use.

frenchmills read my blog view my photos
May 30, 2008 | 8:28 AM

snoopydad24

the tests are part of our President's NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND program.

Early in the school year, children have to take these tests and their performance deternmines whether the school has to let students transfer to another school

so City schools open earlier and muchof the instructional day is taken up preparing students for the tests you talk about

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




frenchmills

an avid Missourian 64 years old and married, with children in Colorado, hence the photos from there, and step children here and all have grown up quite well thank you. wish I could go mountain climbing again - just have to settle for the Ozark Mountains instead of the Rockies. Young years spent in North St. Louis County, then teen years in Hyde Park Neighborhood of North St. Louis. Lived in all parts of Missouri, have family in rural Missouri, lived in the Ozarks for about 4 years. Lived in Springfield Mo for another 6, Lived also in Columbia and Kansas City. Returned to St. Louis November 1970 and have live in South St. Louis ever since, have seen many changes, but have seen that the City has remained mainly stable, even grown and attracted young urban professionals with good incomes, an ingredient for a healthy community. Have seen first-hand the circumstances of the disadvantaged of the City. I know somewhat what is going on there.

Member Since: 4/9/2007