Republicans are probably feeling queasy this morning after hearing Hillary Clinton accept President-elect Barack Obama's secretary of state nomination.
On the one hand, they pretty well knew it was coming. Rumors had swirled for over a week. It's perhaps comforting to know that a woman can, in fact, attain a high office even though Gov. Sarah Palin didn't. And one of Palin's gubernatorial counterparts, Janet Napolitano of Arizona, will head Homeland Security, putting yet another female at the top of an important political office.
On the other hand, Clinton is just one more addition to an Obama team increasingly composed of people with ties to President Bill Clinton.
RollCall.com, for example, on Oct. 30 described a meeting of Obama's economic team before the election as looking like "a Clinton administration reunion".
Obama said today that Hillary Clinton has a strong work ethic that will serve the U.S. well, that she will "demand respect in every capital" of the world.
That she has a strong work ethic would be hard to dispute. She's transitioned from former first lady to New York senator, and now a prominent defense position.
But though she may be a skilled politician, it's not completely clear how the world, much less the American people, will view Clinton. This, after all, is the person who erroneously said she narrowly escaped sniper fire in Bosnia. An Obama spokesman was later quoted by CNN as saying the account could be tacked onto "a growing list of instances in which Sen. Clinton has exaggerated her role in foreign and domestic policymaking."
Clinton said she misspoke about that. She was in the middle of a heated primary campaign. She could have easily slipped up, as could any other politician.
The broader question, though, is whether the public will give Obama's foreign policy agenda — as funneled through Hillary — the time of day it needs to make positive change in such places as Iraq and Afghanistan.
We at TigersRightPaw want to know what you think. Will Hillary Clinton help or hurt the Obama administration's stated foreign policy goals? Will she help or hurt American foreign policy in general?
—Nate
| Member Comments | Total Comments: 16 |
|
|
b8kedbeans
Dec 1, 2008 | 10:42 AM |
|||||
|
countrygrl2
Dec 1, 2008 | 1:55 PM |
|||||
|
AnswerMan
Dec 1, 2008 | 2:01 PM |
|||||
|
dannbetty
Dec 1, 2008 | 5:33 PM |
|||||
|
Speedy62269
Dec 1, 2008 | 6:09 PM |
|||||
|
countrygrl2
Dec 2, 2008 | 5:05 AM |
|||||
|
unklehenry
Dec 2, 2008 | 6:21 AM |
|||||
|
Speedy62269
Dec 2, 2008 | 8:20 AM |
|||||
|
b8kedbeans
Dec 2, 2008 | 9:21 AM |
|||||
|
Biker2Max
Dec 2, 2008 | 9:31 AM |
|||||
|
b8kedbeans
Dec 2, 2008 | 11:35 AM |
|||||
|
mechany144
Dec 2, 2008 | 1:50 PM |
|||||
|
mr_wildflower
Dec 2, 2008 | 4:28 PM |
|||||
|
TigersRightPaw
Dec 2, 2008 | 5:36 PM |
|||||
|
TigersRightPaw
Dec 2, 2008 | 7:29 PM |
|||||
|
TigersRightPaw
Dec 3, 2008 | 9:34 AM |
|||||
|
|||||
Four University of Missouri School of Journalism students give conservative issues and the Republican Party a fair shake.
Member Since: 9/10/2007