MyFox
 

SoundOffBlog's Blog

by SoundOffBlog from St. Louis, MO

Last Post 17 hours Ago


Miley Cyrus appeared topless in a 'Vanity Fair' photo shoot.

The picture is a bit racy but some argue you can't see anything but her back. Miley says she's now embarrassed by the photo.

"I took part in a photo shoot that was supposed to be 'artistic' and now, seeing the photographs and reading the story, I feel so embarrassed," Cyrus said Sunday in a statement through her publicist. "I never intended for any of this to happen and I apologize to my fans who I care so deeply about."

Miley Cyrus Shoot - Courtesy VanityFair.com

What do you think?


94 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 94
Page 1 of 5
1
Last
USFemail-retired read my blog view my photos
Apr 28, 2008 | 6:49 AM

That is disgusting! To me it's child porn. She looks like a sl**!

stlgirl read my blog view my photos
Apr 28, 2008 | 6:54 AM

Its horrible! My 9 yr old daughter loves her, and its a bad example for her young fans. Ive seen other pics of her in panties with her shirt raised...looked like she took herself. My 13 yr old said those were photoshopped, either way the Vanity Fair arent! Billy Ray needs to kick her achy brraky ass!! JMO

USFemail-retired read my blog view my photos
Apr 28, 2008 | 6:56 AM

STLgirl, I totally agree with you! I just heard the clip on tv........manipulated? No way! This spoiled rich brat knew exactly what she was doing. What do we have here, the next Lindsay Lohan??

rosie read my blog view my photos
Apr 28, 2008 | 6:56 AM

the photographer should be the one in trouble, not the child...

USFemail-retired read my blog view my photos
Apr 28, 2008 | 6:58 AM

Yeah, but nobody made her do it! I mean, did they peal her clothes off and shove her in front of the camera and make her have that pouty look on her face? Kinda doubt it! It's all about the money and fame. She wouldn't be someone I'd want my little girl to idolize!

stlgirl read my blog view my photos
Apr 28, 2008 | 7:03 AM

She is going to be another Britney Spears... remember her cover on Rolling Stone?! Look at her now.

USFemail-retired read my blog view my photos
Apr 28, 2008 | 7:07 AM

Yep, you're right....and her parents were there with her. Shame on them all!

momof5 read my blog view my photos
Apr 28, 2008 | 7:36 AM

i think its discusting too! shes 15 NOT 35!

dannbetty read my blog view my photos
Apr 28, 2008 | 7:52 AM

I hope parents pay as much attention to what their own kids are doing, as they do these 'child wonders'.

USFemail-retired read my blog view my photos
Apr 28, 2008 | 8:06 AM

Yep, I paid attention to my kids. They are all grown up now and I never had provacative pics taken of them either.

momoffour read my blog view my photos
Apr 28, 2008 | 8:17 AM

There would NEVER be a chance in HE!! that I would let my 15 yr. old daughter pose for pictures like this...what were her parents thinking??? This was also wrong for the magazine to even ask that she pose like this...anything to make a buck....

glasgowdug read my blog view my photos
Apr 28, 2008 | 8:24 AM

When I first heard of this story I was completely outraged! Now, after seeing the picture, it's not as bad as I was expecting! Yet, still a little too sexy, like she just got done in bed look. (if you ask me, oh you did)lol

I think Vanity Fair and the photographer should be charged for distributing child pornography! (NOTHING LESS) Sure, it doesn't show genitalia but, she's a MINOR in a presumed provocative situation, that just doesn't need to be!

USFemail-retired read my blog view my photos
Apr 28, 2008 | 8:29 AM

Glasgowdug, that's true, but they didn't take her shirt off. She did that herself. It wasn't an accident.

mechany144 read my blog view my photos
Apr 28, 2008 | 8:39 AM

Famous people is nuts. She is way to young for this. All of it. Let her be a kid.

babygirl2mr
Apr 28, 2008 | 8:44 AM

My daughters love her, but I don't like the fact that she posed like that. There is no excuse for it. She and her father had the opportunity to look over the pictures before they were published and if she had any doubts, she would have said.

marley read my blog
Apr 28, 2008 | 9:02 AM

i think she looks terrified

thats show biz for ya unfortunatly but i still think she is ok and i agree i think the photographer should take some of the heat for this to

and yes i would kick my daughters butt if she did something like that

sarcasticdragon
Apr 28, 2008 | 9:11 AM

What made her do this?
What was she thinking?

Just the fact she allowed this sort of picture to be taken tells me she has no morals and no pride.

Find your kids a new hero.
Miley aint worth it.

By the way where was DADDY during all this?

AussieMom read my blog view my photos
Apr 28, 2008 | 9:19 AM

It doesn't matter who took her shirt off - she is only 15 and therefore not of age to consent to this on her own. The magazine, the photographer, and her parents, since they were present, should all be charged with child pornography. If they wanted a bare back picture she could have worn a halter top. The fact that they wrapped her in a sheet proves they were after something more provocative.

mooch read my blog
Apr 28, 2008 | 9:34 AM

shame,shame, SHAME!!!!! Very poor taste. Not a good choice.

jeanette read my blog view my photos
Apr 28, 2008 | 9:37 AM

I would of thought mom and dad would of had to approve this before it is done and when they seen what type of picture's being taken they would of put a stop to it. Unlike the paparazzi that they have no control over at the time. Now with storie's ike this happening all the time with star's you would think they would know better.

Page 1 of 5
1
Last


Write your comment below:




SoundOffBlog

Sound off St. Louis! It's your chance to have your opinion read on myFOXstl.com and possibly heard on the air during our newscasts! And if you know someone you would like to see "Sound Off" on FOX 2 News, please let us know. This blog is moderated by the myFOX Web Team.

Member Since: 1/23/2007