MyFox
 

Patch_W_Adams's St Louis Blog

by Patch_W_Adams from St Louis

Last Post 18 hours Ago


Ok,  this is a disturbing trend......

According to the Washington Post the United States Federal Government wants to have 20,000 Federal Troops, Not National Guard, Federal regualr Military Troops deployed in the States to assist state and local law officials in case of an emergency.  Those  "emergencies" range from terrorist attacks, natural disasters and even civilian uprising.....The 20,000 troops will include three 4,700 man Fast Reaction Forces.

Thats right.... civilian uprising similar to the LA Riots...  or at least that is what they say.

Now I am sorry, this is Bull....  Who believes this?   What do we need three 4,700 man Fast Reaction Force for in the United States???  Are we going to get invaded by a large number of Terrorists?   Is the National Guard Not Good enough anymore???

This Ladies and Gentlemen is for one Reason and one Reason only.....they read the Blogs....they hear the Talk...they see the anger...  

This is a Force to do nothing but suppress what they fear may be an eventual Revolution.

I love the Armed Forces.  My family has a long and Proud Tradition of serving this Great Country, from the Revolution to the Current War my family has always had someone serving.   I Love this Country and Never want to see it fall.

But this concept of deploying troops under Homeland Security  in the United States is wrong..  

The National Guard has always been used for these matters and the Gov. of each state has always had the say in who gets deployed to where in case of an emergency.  This new Deployment will interfere with the States Rights and will renew the Fear of the Founding Fathers about standing Armies.

This is not a direction we wish to go.  This will not supress Revolutionary Ideas, but increase them, even support them. 

I pray that the wisdom to negate this deployment will be granted to someone, somewhere......before it's too late.

 

 

To read the whole article Go To:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/articl
e/2008/11/30/AR2008113002217_pf.html

7 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 7
Page 1 of 1
harp read my blog view my photos
Dec 1, 2008 | 2:05 PM

I think I know why I hope I wrong about it but I belive they are preparing for something that might happed...

I pray it never does because I belive in the man I voted for and belive he can change things..

AnswerMan read my blog
Dec 1, 2008 | 2:23 PM

Bringing them back into the United States is fine.

I think this desired deployment will be half the number they want and the other half will be deployed to their home areas.

You'll find that it will not be nearly as bad as it sounds.

Getting them out of Iraq would be great and giving them some R and R is important.

mechany144 read my blog view my photos
Dec 1, 2008 | 3:18 PM

People hear the words Fast Reaction Force and automatically think it means armed forces.
It could just as well be hospital groups, engineering groups, rescue forces or edible support.
Now, if it is suppresion forces I will have a problem with it. If it is combat forces, I will have a problem with it.

mechany144 read my blog view my photos
Dec 1, 2008 | 3:23 PM

Okay, read the article and it stated just what I thought. These are not full combat troops but support units. Only 8% are security troops.

dannbetty read my blog view my photos
Dec 1, 2008 | 5:21 PM

No reason ti lock and load---yet.

mr_wildflower read my blog view my photos
Dec 1, 2008 | 9:49 PM

Well at least over here they won't have to worry about roadside bombs.......

Just Carjackings...........

Patch_W_Adams read my blog
Dec 2, 2008 | 6:34 AM

I agree there is no reason to "lock and Load." now or in the near future..... And yes there are Medical, Chemical and other Support Units in this Rapid Reaction Force. But is this Concept really neccessary? Hasn't this capability always been there at the request of the Gov. of the state in case of emergency?

Yes of course it has....So the question is Why?

This move "breaks the mold" by assigning an active-duty combat brigade to the Northern Command for the first time. First Time...Why?

We have Civilian Volunteer programs like Cert, we have the National Guard, and the States can request more help if neccessary. It has worked in the past, why change Now?

They use the excuse of multiple similtanious Nuke, Chem or Bio attacks in the U.S....that States may be over their heads if this happens....

If that happens we are going to need alot more than 20,000 troops....

So Why then? It really doesn't make much sense.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




Patch_W_Adams

www.poedpatriot.blogspot.
com......................
"But war, in a good cause, is not the greatest evil which a nation can suffer. War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things: the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks nothing worth a war, is worse. When a people are used as mere human instruments for firing cannon or thrusting bayonets, in the service and for the selfish purposes of a master, such war degrades a people. A war to protect other human beings against tyrannical injustice – a war to give victory to their own ideas of right and good, and which is their own war, carried on for an honest purpose by their free choice – is often the means of their regeneration. A man who has nothing which he is willing to fight for, nothing which he cares more about than he does about his personal safety, is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. As long as justice and injustice have not terminated their ever-renewing fight for ascendancy in the affairs of mankind, human beings must be willing, when need is, to do battle for the one against the other." - John Stuart Mill

Member Since: 4/30/2008