MyFox
 

JosephThePoet's Blog

by JosephThePoet from Barrie, Ontario Canada

Last Post 3 days Ago


 

We are told they must act now and very quickly or we’ll all suffer.  They want to take another $Trillion from the people who make up the country and this is how are they are going to spend it.  They are going to bail out those who have the most money to protect their wealth position above everyone else.  Now all US citizens pay attention and keep repeating this mantra, “they are doing it to protect us and the whole world from the collapse of our economic system that has such strong fundamentals of structure”.

Earlier this year the politicians said they must act quickly then scattered $160 Billion around on an “Economic Stimulus” package.  Now they are saying we must act quickly and want to scatter around another $Trillion on an “Economic Protection” plan.  Will the next “economic” plan be called the “Whoops, I Don’t Get It”, or maybe the “I’m out of Here and You’re Toast” plan?

They are going to bail out banks.  Are not individual accounts of we the people protected by FDIC up to $100,000.00?  Have we not also been told FDIC has the financial recourses to cover the failure of many banks?  Let the banks fail then, give the people some of their money through the FDIC funds, then buy the bank’s business under bankruptcy bargain basement terms if you wish to use some of the people’s money to keep banks solvent and the money fluid in our communities.  This time fire the big shots that have proven to be incompetent and yet have demanded massive salaries and golden parachutes if their position at the company ever ends, even if their own actions were the cause of the whole company’s failure.  Do you work for your boss under the knowledge that even if you threaten the jobs of all the people working at the company, or fully destroy the company, you will still be given enough money to support a life of ease and comfort for your entire lifetime as you go along your merry way?  No, most of us have to prove competent or we’ll be justly fired and told to take a hike (and sometimes not so politely).

Of course if there are no rules in an economic structure to reign in the vile and greedy then even doing things that actually result in the beneficial movement of our economy will not prevent an eventual economic collapse.  Can anyone realize what the boom to our economy could have been like if the first $160 Billion dollars had instead been spent in a manner to boost the employment level of the people of the country while at the same time making the US energy independent, protecting our infrastructures, and protecting our inheritance of technical superiority to better ensure our opportunity as a country to survive now and flourish into the future?  PEOPLE NEED TO HAVE AN INCOME TO BUY HOMES AND OTHER GOODS, DUH!!!  Does it not make sense to protect the people that are the economic engine of the country to protect a country instead of trying to temporarily ensure some currently wealth blessed people’s comfort level?

What will the politicians do?  Will they protect the future of all the country’s people or try to prop up the perceived safety of some people who currently enjoy extra living comforts and a belief of comfort for their future?  If we fail as a country then the currently comfortable and extra comfortable living among us will fall a lot further, faster, and harder.  Yes I agree with them that time is running out to act, but how they choose to act concerning this will determine the degree of the near-term suffering and the future ability of the country to chart its own course in the world.

 

4 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 4
Page 1 of 1
JosephThePoet read my blog
Sep 24, 2008 | 4:57 PM

Bipartisanism and Leadership

I just listened to Obama’s response to McCain’s statement that he wanted the two of them to go to Washington to get their parties working in a bipartisan manner to find solutions to the economic protection bill problems, and to suspend the upcoming Friday debate on international issues.

Obama said he didn’t want to use this economic problem for politics then quickly and frequently told us that he was the first to call McCain today for them to put out a joint statement on what the bill should include. He also stated that the Friday debate should proceed so they can inform the people of where they stand on the issues concerning the bill. He said they should be able to do the debate because a president would have to be able to do more then one thing at a time and this gave them an opportunity to show that they can do that. Where are the bipartisan working together for a solution and the not using this for political gain?

Obama also said that “they” were working on it in Washington and that if “they” want to hear from us then “they” will call us. Is this the leadership from a man who claims he has the ability to understand what is important and to work across the aisle to make sure the right decisions are made in the best interests of the country, or just a man leaving the decisions up to others while he votes not-present-call-me-when-it’s-over?

JosephThePoet read my blog
Sep 25, 2008 | 11:14 AM

They have something in place to protect against banks failing. It’s called the FDIC. But the politicians don’t want it to be used and instead want to take $Trillion from the public to prop up the banks.

They claim that people will lose investments and banks might not give the temporary loans to businesses for their payrolls. If a company is dealing with a bank that starts acting irresponsibly with them about short period payroll loans then maybe it’s time the company changes banks. If enough people leave the bank it will fail then the FDIC can do their job and the government can pick up the bank at bankruptcy rates and inject cash into it to continue the employment of the regular employee and ensure money movement among people and businesses. Eventually the banks can be sold back to the private sector and the original investment can be recouped, and with a profit too.

How can the banks be encouraged to start acting with a semblance of comprehension about how to properly make loan risk evaluations, which is in fact their job, if there are no consequences for their incompetence?

The idea of saying people will lose their investment and people and businesses might find it harder to get loans is foolishness because the same things have occurred in the past when large companies or groups of companies have failed. It’s a good thing people got bailed out during the High Tech meltdown and the Enron mess and didn’t lose their investments, right? People didn’t lose money and banks didn’t tighten credit when the bottom fell out of the property markets in the past either

JosephThePoet read my blog
Sep 25, 2008 | 11:15 AM

People didn’t lose money and banks didn’t tighten credit when the bottom fell out of the property markets in the past either, right?

PSylvester20 read my blog
Sep 25, 2008 | 3:18 PM

You know what they say about death and taxes. Well, I think Americans can add one more "sure thing" to the list. That is, when the two parties get together in some bipartisan effort, it means the taxpayers are getting screwed!

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




JosephThePoet

I have diplomas in electronics and computer programming, and an employment background that includes security, supervisory, and laser communications components manufacture and trouble shooting. I am receiving a small provincial disability support and am trying to earn a living as a poet. My first poetry book "Life is a Puzzle" by JosephThePoet can be found at: http://www.barnesandnoble
.com/ http://www.publishamerica
.com/ http://www.amazon.com/ Anyone wishing to copy and share my posted poems with others may do so if they include the following, provided they do not try to make any money from them: Author JosephThePoet of Life is a Puzzle by PublishAmerica. Anyone wishing to share my posts and my comments may also do so provided they indicate they are mine and don’t try to make money from the practice. If you share a debate I make in a comment area please follow the same rules and also eliminate any person’s moniker I may have referenced if I used part of their comment in my argument.

Member Since: 1/17/2008