MyFox
 

JosephThePoet's Blog

by JosephThePoet from Barrie, Ontario Canada

Last Post 1 day, 1 hour Ago


 

 

There are several threats to North America that need attention, and a solution to ease all of these problems is technically sound.  The physics have been proven, and used, for decades.

Energy independence is a necessity for the security of North America.  Security is not just about bombs and borders.  Our civilization and economy are under threat from actions by big businesses, other countries and radical groups.

Pollution has to be brought under control. The private sector cannot be allowed to continue to poison our planet for their quick dirty profit.  Man-made greenhouse heating is a byproduct of our unrestrained polluting.

Local employment needs a boost.  Too many of the good paying jobs are leaving North America.  We need new products to manufacture and sell.

Those who don’t want change would like us to ignore a more intelligent way of living, and they are benefiting at our expense.  The government is afraid of change in case they may lose a tax source, and they receive a lot of their political money from big businesses.

The U.S. will spend more than $1 trillion in Iraq to, supposedly, secure America’s oil energy needs.

Now consider a product that can address all these needs.  A product that would create jobs ranging from mining and smelting to sales, manufacturing, installation, maintenance and education.

We have all heard of the large amount of energy that will be saved by switching to energy efficient light bulbs.  Well consider if wind generators, of many sizes, are promoted to be built and installed everywhere.  Homes and businesses could have generators to assist in meeting their energy needs that are also hooked into the grid to add to our available power, and these will protect us locally during blackouts.  A single backup gas generator doesn’t supply the full power requirements of a home, nor does a single wind or solar collector need to.  Cars were not as energy efficient when first introduced as they are today, and these power collectors will also improve in efficiency over time.

Farmers in need of extra income could receive assistance to install the larger wind generators, one or more, on their property instead of gearing up to use food crops as fuel sources.

The government should aggressively promote hydrogen powered vehicles also, by ensuring hydrogen can be accessed as easily as gasoline is.

Oil has pollution in everything about it.  Look at the roads after a rain and oil is everywhere.

The government must stop catering to big businesses and wasting tax money to prop up the oil industries, and must instead address the threats to our planet and economy.

The political candidates should promote a path into our future, not just babble vaguely about working on these threats to North America.  The economy, energy and pollution must be addressed now.

23 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 23
Page 1 of 2
1
Last
Weird read my blog view my photos
Jan 20, 2008 | 9:18 PM

Any generator will need copper for the windings. In the last five years the price of copper has risen steadily to record prices. That oil residue you find on our roadways is mostly petroleum products lost from transmissions, drive axles, differentials, and wheel bearings. Very little is directly attributed to the internal combustion engine. Farmers in need of extra money don`t like agribusinesses that live on government subsidies for not growing crops. Oil security needs have never been the reason for the war in Iraq. Providing generators for businesses and consumers, hooked to the grid? What type of power does that generator use, gasoline or diesel? Wind generators aren`t predictable enough to spend what it would cost to install them and make a profit. Compact flourescent bulbs use 13% of the energy that an incandescent bulb does, but LEDs use about 3% and don`t present a danger to landfills that the mercury in compact flourescent bulbs do. Oil companies don`t have any interest in promoting hydrogen powered vehicles. The cost of the real estate to build new service stations would be astronomical. The only way we could convert to hydrogen would be for petroleum companies to provide the locations for these hydrogen pumps. Therefore, they would still have us in a stranglehold. The only thing we can do is to demand honesty from our politicians and remove those who aren`t.

Weird read my blog view my photos
Jan 20, 2008 | 9:25 PM

In other words, write your Congressman, Senator, President, Dogcatcher and anyone else who is an elected official. Tell them your concerns, how you would fix them, and tell them that you vote. You do realize that only about half the qualified voters in America bother to even cast a ballot, don`t you? You also have to understand that over one half of the donations used by the two parties to conduct their campaigns comes from lobbyists and corporate donations. They don`t give that money away because they like the person, they expect something in return. The sooner we force election reform on our government, the sooner these other things will fix themselves.

JosephThePoet read my blog
Jan 21, 2008 | 10:19 AM

First: Who cares that copper prices are higher than whenever, everything costs more today.

Second: Most of the oil stains on the road are oil stains, not brake and transmission fluids, and petroleum products are oil based (petroleum).

Third: You say, “very little is directly attributed to the internal combustion engine”. Who is against all internal combustion engines?

Fourth: You say “Farmers in need of extra money don’t like agribusinesses that live on government subsidies for not growing crops”. If having a larger wind mill type electrical power generator on the property the farmers receive at least a percentage of the generated power income, and maybe maintenance income as well, so could more so afford to grow that which they wish.

Fifth: I gave President Bush the benefit of the doubt about why America went into Iraq, but he proved otherwise. It was never about Saddam’s sadistic ways and of him having weapons of mass destruction.

Sixth: “What type of power does that generator use, gasoline or diesel?” I would say diesel if it’s enough to power a whole home, but most people only have a small gas backup generator. The wind generators are powered by wind, solar by sunlight, and hydrogen fueled vehicles by hydrogen.

JosephThePoet read my blog
Jan 21, 2008 | 10:20 AM

Seventh: “Wind generators aren’t predictable enough to spend what it would cost to install them and make a profit”. Did spending $1 trillion in Iraq give us any security? What would you say is a good way to get security? I’d say having non oil sourced power so no one could cut off your power is the biggest security we need today. Without power we’re toast. Wind turbines could be made to sell in ranges from $500.00 to millions per unit. I think Americans would like to have more predictable power than imported oil. Add solar collectors and how much less oil would we need to burn, and how much greater will be our local safety?

“Compact fluorescent bulbs use 13% of the energy that an incandescent bulb does, but LEDs use about 3% and don’t present a danger to landfills that the mercury in compact fluorescent bulbs do”. That is where our leaders are supposed to govern responsibly. Immediately upon becoming aware of a threat to the people, our leaders should act. They can demand rules to protect their greatest asset, us. If all the businesses are on the same footing then there is no conflict, and if a business turns out dangerous to us then it deserves to be ended.

JosephThePoet read my blog
Jan 21, 2008 | 10:20 AM

“Oil companies don’t have any interest in promoting hydrogen powered vehicles. The cost of the real estate to build new service stations would be astronomical. The only way we could convert to hydrogen would be for petroleum companies to provide the locations for these hydrogen pumps. Therefore, they would still have us in a stranglehold”. Any local business that has a wind turbine could use it during downtime to separate out hydrogen, and businesses sell stuff. To aggressively promote hydrogen fuelled vehicles would be to legally require gas stations to have hydrogen supplies on hand. The local gas station is a business also, so having a business sized wind turbine will give added income.

JosephThePoet read my blog
Jan 21, 2008 | 2:07 PM

Further to the mercury bulbs versus the LEDs: If the luminescence required can be achieved by LED collections than it is foolish for us to allow a mercury threat to us and our future. We have removed mercury from other aspects of our lives because of the threat it poses. Creating more energy will make it easier for us to make the right choices. An example would be putting a wind and solar collector on each of the many light poles we have will make more power available for other uses then homeowners switching to the mercury bulbs will. Adding a wind generator or two to a home, and solar panels too if wanted, is far superior than the home owner changing to mercury laden light bulbs. And if efficiency is important, and LEDs are more energy efficient for an equal luminescence, then it makes more sense to promote LED lighting in our homes and businesses. And there are many aristic business opportunities in providing new LED lighting systems to us.

An additional side about oil companies: Oil companies spend $billions on finding and drilling for oil, and have been receiving record profits to invest. They could choose to spend some of those $billions on equipment to become energy producers and suppliers and save the oil for other uses instead of burning it up. I’m not against oil, just how it is currently being wasted and how it is poisoning our world by our sloppy use of it.

Weird read my blog view my photos
Jan 21, 2008 | 6:12 PM

If every city, town and hamlet in the United States changed from high pressure sodium or mercury vapor lighting for their streets and started using LED technology it would free up enough energy to light and heat over forty six million homes with power left over. The copper price indicates what that wind generator will cost. The cheapest wind powered generator I`ve seen has a price tag of well over $2600.00 and that doesn`t include the hardware to mount the windmill or the switching panel to link to the electrical grid safely. Add the cost of a licensed electrician for at least one day and you`re closer to spending around $6,000.00. The estimated electrical output of that size machine would account for about $90.00 a year in rural Misouri. That`s without any mechanical trouble, structural problems, or vandalism by someone stealing that copper windings. To get a windmill that generates enough electricity to make it worthwhile you need to spend closer to the $10,000 neighborhood, without installation. You would also have to insure that wind generator and that could be a problem because of the lack of companies that carry that coverage. I stand by my statement that most stains on roadways come from transmission leaks, drivetrain leaks and faulty brake systems. Oil companies also spend millions in campaign donations. That insures that they get lucrative contracts, little government intervention and a free reign when they raise gasoline prices.

Weird read my blog view my photos
Jan 21, 2008 | 6:32 PM

If the government required oil companies to store and distribute hydrogen the oil companies would have to be compensated for their time and trouble. Since I already mentioned that most oil companies have plenty of politicians in their back pockets, you already know that this would be a lucrative business venture for any oil company that installed tanks. The most intelligent use of wind power is to build a wind farm, a place with lots of wind generators all in a single location. Putting them in many locations means that the maintenance costs would be much higher than to inspect several in one location. A lack of inspections would create an unnecessary danger to the public. We could manufacture methane gas by composting leaves and grass clippings in a controlled environment if we wanted to. That methane could be used as fuel for a large electrical generator. Wood waste can be used to make bio-diesel also, instead of using corn to make ethanol, damaged trees or logging waste can be run through chippers and transported to refineries very easily. But all this doesn`t mean a thing unless we can convince our politicians that we will not stand for business as usual. Every voter in every precinct needs to tell their elected officials about their concerns and demand changes to solve these problems.

JosephThePoet read my blog
Jan 22, 2008 | 12:15 PM

I'm glad to see you promoting methane instead of using corn. The cleaner use of coal is also worthwhile, and there are plenty of natural gas sources for our needs as well.

As far as the cost of wind turbines goes, there are few companies currently making them. The cost will decrease with large scale manufacturing and competition. The same goes for solar collectors. If anything is sold in small quantities then the selection of quality and price for the consumer is severely limited.

Is several thousand dollars too much to pay when you consider the financial increases of fuel and the security threat of the loss of power against the comfort of knowing that at least some of your energy sources are secure? I believe there are many businesses and people who would be glad to purchase their own power generators to protect against the regular power supply interruptions alone. The patriotic factor will also speed purchases.

JosephThePoet read my blog
Jan 22, 2008 | 12:15 PM

The idea of climbing to someone’s roof, or to the top of poles to get the little copper in the units is beyond what most thieves would attempt. It is easier to steal a car, or do a smash and grab.

Hydrogen refuelling stations must be in place or manufacturers will not try to sell hydrogen powered vehicles that people know they cannot conveniently use. The government incentive package could refund a percentage of the costs for people and businesses to install wind/solar power generating packages, and anyone setting up a standardized hydrogen fuelling station could get an additional tax reduction as well.

Wind farms have to be carefully placed to, at the least, not threaten migrating or local flyers. As far as maintenance costs being too high if the wind mills are not packed together, I believe having thousands in a city is packing them together. If a small farm business agrees to have a large wind mill placed on his farm then part of the agreement may include his maintaining the unit.

JosephThePoet read my blog
Jan 22, 2008 | 12:16 PM

There are always many excuses to not do anything. Nothing we own would ever have come to be, if people just sat around nitpicking and demanding perfection before starting something. We cannot afford to not promote large scale sales of wind and solar power collectors. The economy needs a solid boost, and I believe promoting protecting our local energy needs is a valid way to address both issues.

Weird read my blog view my photos
Jan 22, 2008 | 12:52 PM

The Bush administration has cut funding to many educational facilities that did research on energy needs. We`re at the point where we could have a paint that would generate electricity just like the expensive solar panels do at less than one hundredth the cost. But that research isn`t being funded by government grants any more and you don`t hear much about it any more. A farmer doesn`t have the training to maintain a wind generator, that will have to be done by trained technicians. If wind generators were built in the quantities you suggest, the quantity of the copper needed for the windings would drive the cost to levels that would make their construction unprofitable. Copper theft has already included electrical transmission lines, what makes you think that theives wouldn`t steal the copper that`s used to make the connection to powerlines or the device that switches from the grid to the generator? We need technology, funded by either private enterprise or the government. In the last few years we went from having the best educational system on the planet to ninth place. Part of this is caused by the loss of funding by the government. The Annual Cost of Living is used to calculate how much is spent on education. That Cost of Living is calculated by the rise in price of goods EXCLUDING...gasoline, diesel fuel, heating oil, electricity, fresh produce(including milk,eggs, and meat)and prescription drugs. That means that every year those costs rise above the average of other products we lose ground.

Weird read my blog view my photos
Jan 22, 2008 | 1:07 PM

The real sad part of your blog is the amazing rush by others to reply to what you have stated. These are important issues that will affect every one of us in the near future and I mean it WILL affect us. Economists have already estimated that gasoline prices will reach four dollars a gallon by June of 2008. The drought in the Southeast is already affecting hydroelectric production by a huge percentage. Drinking water is in short supply in Georgia, Alabama, and the Carolinas. With the current debt carried by our government we have cut services to the lowest income families that include health care and housing. When these lower income people become ill they will be treated in hospitals and emergency rooms without any way of paying that bill. Hospitals and doctors take those bad debts and add that to the cost of health care for the rest of those who can pay for it. That drives prices up, slowly causing even more of this to occur. But this must not bother others since they haven`t expended the energy to reply for or against your blog. What you wrote was well thought out, in part, and relevant to everyone, but it seems that if you write too much you get few responses. Lazy asses pass over long blogs. It`s really a shame, isn`t it?

JosephThePoet read my blog
Jan 23, 2008 | 9:19 AM

The farmer doesn’t have to personally do the maintenance, if that is part of the contract, only ensure that it gets done. But a lot of farmers already have experience keeping their equipment running, so it wouldn’t take a lot of additional training for them to be able to maintain the units or become service contractors themselves.

Not making things because thieves may steal them makes no sense. Thieves will steal anything.

And what will be the real cost if we do nothing? You can forget about education, healthcare, and all other programs in the entire country if we don’t act now to protect our energy requirements. Just take a few minutes to think about what will happen to our society if energy suddenly becomes scarce. Our society will collapse and civil unrest will help speed up the destruction of our structures and systems.

JosephThePoet read my blog
Jan 23, 2008 | 9:20 AM

Having many wind and solar energy devices will allow us to easier promote the switch over to hydrogen as well, by allowing more people to separate out hydrogen to sell, which will further protect our power sources.

Telling the American public that X billions of dollars will be available in refunds if they installed wind and solar packages, with an additional amount given if they linked them to the grid, will cause a massive business surge that could kick start the economy as people seek to cash in. Just throwing our a check to everyone and hoping they spend it in a way that will benefit the economy, instead of promoting a plan that will help protect our way of life, is just plain reckless. And this way the people and businesses have already spent their money promoting the economy, and protecting our energy needs, before they can get the allocated money.

Like I said before, we can always look for excuses to do nothing.

Weird read my blog view my photos
Jan 24, 2008 | 2:43 PM

While I haven`t looked recently, almost all the wind powered generators available on the market are made in foreign countries. The largest number come from China. The bulk of our copper comes from the Democratic nation of the Congo, where there is a civil war going on where about five point four million people have been killed in the last decade. I`m a farmer, I can repair a tractor and I have excellant mechanical ability, but I do not have training to work on high tension power lines nor do I own the equipment to do that type of work, no farmer does. Many states already have programs that give you rebates if you insulate your home, install energy saving devices like tankless water heaters or solar panels, or install generators that are hooked up to backfeed into the "grid" when you aren`t using all the power you`re generating. Most people don`t have the money to install solar panels or generators. You`re talking about a substantial amount of money. I`ll tell you what, you buy and pay to install as many wind generators as you can afford and I`ll lease you the land to install them. I`ll lease you the land to install one wind turbine for a dollar a year and you keep the profits from all energy generated. Every turbine you install will cost you one dollar a year, but you have to install and maintain them. I have room for at least six hundred turbines.

JosephThePoet read my blog
Jan 25, 2008 | 9:33 AM

One of the things I was previously thinking the politicians could do was to offer to pay for the purchase of a large wind turbine and its installation for small farmers who are willing to allow it on their property in exchange for a percentage of the generated income, with the allowance that the farmer could at any time choose to purchase the unit from the government for the exact original cost of the purchase and installation. This they may wish to do this in place of the rebating they are currently giving to farmers for various reasons.

There are different levels of maintenance, from regular monitoring for developing problems to the full repair of the product. Whether or not a farmer wishes to upgrade his training and tool supply, and to what level, is up to him.

JosephThePoet read my blog
Jan 25, 2008 | 9:34 AM

Try to get past your continued thinking about only large generators. I stated “all sizes”, and even mentioned the use of our street lighting poles for holding many of these units. That is a lot of units of this size for companies gearing up for mass production, and cities use most of our power so using our in-place structures to help create power makes sense. Think about the top of skyscrapers also for different sized units that building owners could install to reduce their future energy purchasing needs. Add the homeowner who could buy a package that includes x number of wind units with or without solar panels as well. Legislators may also wish to prevent large wind farm businesses from cashing in and taking more then their fair share of assistance, after all this is supposed to stimulate the economy not just help a few businesses with their costs. There are many manufacturing companies losing their current sales and in need of other products to make and sell.

You keep mentioning the high price of copper as a disincentive but fail to realize that, with China and India coming on line, all resources will continue to become more expensive. And $100 billion plus will buy a lot.

JosephThePoet read my blog
Jan 25, 2008 | 9:35 AM

The fact that most wind generators come from other countries is frightening, especially when you add in the fact that so much of our current power supplies are also so dependant on other countries. The politicians had a chance to address this weakness by structuring their stimulation package to include quick rebates to US businesses for the specific equipment needed to manufacture wind generators and solar collectors, and to encourage their purchase and installation. If cities would get half their cost back to buy non-fueled energy creating devices then smart mayors would invest to help protect their cities power needs that will only continue to increase.

If the politicians had said to the US public that there is $100 billion plus available in rebates for purchasing and installing wind and solar electrical power generators, then I think there would be a lot of businesses and people who would rush to get their piece of the pie. And the jobs created will be better then McDonalds and Walmart offer.

The economic stimulus package should have been focused to stimulate the US economy and protect our interests, but a lot of the money they plan to send out will go to promoting China’s economy and interests when it gets spent in stores like Walmart.

Weird read my blog view my photos
Jan 25, 2008 | 9:58 AM

Light poles wouldn`t be capable of carrying the weight and stress of a wind turbine. Skyscrapers aren`t designed to carry the weight and vibration of a wind generator. To mount a wind turbine you need a very strong structure, a firm footing, access to high tension power lines, and a converter to switch from personal use to sending power back into the grid. Then you have the liability to people doing maintenance on power lines. If you had multiple sources of electric you would need to shut down all of them to repair a downed power line because backfeeding could electrocute the person doing that repair. Let`s try to stick with everyone changing their habits to start using less energy. That could happen immediately, not next year, and wouldn`t take government intervention.

Page 1 of 2
1
Last


Write your comment below:




JosephThePoet

I have diplomas in electronics and computer programming, and an employment background that includes security, supervisory, and laser communications components manufacture and trouble shooting. I am receiving a small provincial disability support and am trying to earn a living as a poet. My first poetry book "Life is a Puzzle" by JosephThePoet can be found at: http://www.barnesandnoble
.com/ http://www.publishamerica
.com/ http://www.amazon.com/ Anyone wishing to copy and share my posted poems with others may do so if they include the following, provided they do not try to make any money from them: Author JosephThePoet of Life is a Puzzle by PublishAmerica. Anyone wishing to share my posts and my comments may also do so provided they indicate they are mine and don’t try to make money from the practice. If you share a debate I make in a comment area please follow the same rules and also eliminate any person’s moniker I may have referenced if I used part of their comment in my argument.

Member Since: 1/17/2008