Anonymous

must have been OK at dodge ball




But seriously, if one can throw two shoes at him (reaching down and picking them up), note how long it took security to react and get near him. The reporter in front of the shoe thrower acted faster.

Sure, surreal to them, but what about that famed instinct.

This kind of crap has been in the business section of the New York Times since year of our Lord, One Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty-One. I understand that now it's on "Regis and Kelly" and "The View", people are scared and confused.

WaMu had a lot of assets. A lot. Well over 320 BILLION dollars of assets. 13 billion of that is cash money. Your f@66otry free checking account with 700 dollars in it isn't going anywhere. In fact, you could have hundreds of thousands of dollars in there and it'd be fine.

The only issue is if everyone wants to go get their cash. Bank runs are only going to continue the domino effect. Nothing even has to be inherently WRONG for our financial system to collapse. Just a bunch of F@6s who all think pulling pieces of cotton out of a teller's drawer is better than having credit printed on a piece of paper. Banks have NEVER had enough money to cover all demand deposits. Not in the 30s, not in the 70s, not in the 90s.

There is no need to worry your pretty little head about man things like the FDIC. The FDIC is not necessary here. All those assets I mentioned? They're all owned by JPMorgan now and they will make sure that those assets are available to your checking account.

And just like the banks, they don't have enough money for everyone either. They're a fairy tail that helps you sleep at night. But that's fine. Because JPMorgan has 13 billion dollars in cash they just BOUGHT to cover all of your account. I don't care if you have FIVE hundred thousand dollars in the bank. IT WILL ALL BE THERE IF YOU DON'T TRY AND GET IT TOMORROW.Or just F it! Go get your moniez so the USA will collapse. Then we can see what's up with survival of the fittest.

"If you outlaw guns, then only criminals will have guns"

If you outlaw cocaine, then only criminals will have cocaine. Does this mean the law serves no purpose, since anyone who wants cocaine can get it anyways?

The fact is, criminalizing cocaine really is a deterrent. Cocaine being illegal means it's more difficult to get than it would be if it were legal. This means less people use cocaine than otherwise would.

If you make it harder for potential murderers to get guns, less potential murderers will get guns.

"You can still murder people with knives, bats, ropes, etc"

Then why care so much about having a gun? If it really were exactly as easy to kill a person with a knife as with a gun, no one would argue against gun control, because they could just use a knife and be no worse off.

The fact that people demand to have guns proves that guns cannot be equated to swords and bats.

People are lazy. Making something more difficult really does cause people to think twice. If you make it harder to murder, less people will murder, and if you make it harder for murderers to get guns, less murderers will get guns.

Common sense.

"How can I protect my home from intruders without a gun?"

Lock your doors, put bars on your windows, invest in a real security system. A gun is not security.

If you have a gun, perhaps you will shoot the intruder before he shoots you. Maybe you'll hit him, maybe you'll miss. Maybe you'll kill him, maybe you'll only wound him. Either way he'll probably fire back. Or perhaps he'll just shoot you before you can shoot him and make the whole aiming problem a non-issue.

"I don't care about the lives that would be saved if we outlawed guns, it's more important that I get to keep my gun because it comforts me" BAwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww ;.(

This is the true argument against gun control.

          I have been keeping and saving any and all spiders I find running around my house. I keep them alive in little tuba wear containers and drop in crickets or whatever random feeder bugs I find at the local petsmart. Anyway,I recently have erected a spider battle arena out of cardboard and sugar cubes. I have about 22 spiders in surplus and plan to make them do one on one combat in a tournament of epic proportions. The loser is devoured by the winner and the winner becomes stronger.

He then lives on to do battle against the next opponent.



Whichever spider is left standing after the other 21 have died will go on to the final round. There is a prey mantis at the vivarium named Charley.The final spider gladiator will do battle with Charley the mantis.If the spider actually manages to beat Charley he will be declared the king of spider land and flushed down the toilet afterwards